Radical Prostatectomy: Sequelae in the Course of Time.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 34124138_BIB_FD54FA7598E0.pdf (216.45 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_FD54FA7598E0
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Radical Prostatectomy: Sequelae in the Course of Time.
Journal
Frontiers in surgery
Author(s)
Kesch C., Heidegger I., Kasivisvanathan V., Kretschmer A., Marra G., Preisser F., Tilki D., Tsaur I., Valerio M., van den Bergh RCN, Fankhauser C.D., Zattoni F., Gandaglia G.
ISSN
2296-875X (Print)
ISSN-L
2296-875X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
8
Pages
684088
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Objective: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a frequent treatment for men suffering from localized prostate cancer (PCa). Whilst offering a high chance for cure, it does not come without a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Herein we review the common adverse effects RP may have over the course of time. Methods: A collaborative narrative review was performed with the identification of the principal studies on the topic. The search was executed by a relevant term search on PubMed from 2010 to February 2021. Results: Rates of major complications in patients undergoing RP are generally low. The main adverse effects are erectile dysfunction varying from 11 to 87% and urinary incontinence varying from 0 to 87% with a peak in functional decline shortly after surgery, and dependent on definitions. Different less frequent side effects also need to be taken into account. The highest rate of recovery is seen within the first year after RP, but even long-term improvements are possible. Nevertheless, for some men these adverse effects are long lasting and different, less frequent side effects also need to be taken into account. Despite many technical advances over the last two decades no surgical approach can be clearly favored when looking at long-term outcome, as surgical volume and experience as well as individual patient characteristics are still the most influential variables. Conclusions: The frequency of erectile function and urinary continence side effects after RP, and the trajectory of recovery, need to be taken into account when counseling patients about their treatment options for prostate cancer.
Keywords
adverse (side) effects, long-term outcome, prostate cancer, retropubic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/06/2021 18:26
Last modification date
23/11/2022 8:17
Usage data