Radical Prostatectomy: Sequelae in the Course of Time.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 34124138_BIB_FD54FA7598E0.pdf (216.45 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_FD54FA7598E0
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Radical Prostatectomy: Sequelae in the Course of Time.
Périodique
Frontiers in surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Kesch C., Heidegger I., Kasivisvanathan V., Kretschmer A., Marra G., Preisser F., Tilki D., Tsaur I., Valerio M., van den Bergh RCN, Fankhauser C.D., Zattoni F., Gandaglia G.
ISSN
2296-875X (Print)
ISSN-L
2296-875X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
8
Pages
684088
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
Objective: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a frequent treatment for men suffering from localized prostate cancer (PCa). Whilst offering a high chance for cure, it does not come without a significant impact on health-related quality of life. Herein we review the common adverse effects RP may have over the course of time. Methods: A collaborative narrative review was performed with the identification of the principal studies on the topic. The search was executed by a relevant term search on PubMed from 2010 to February 2021. Results: Rates of major complications in patients undergoing RP are generally low. The main adverse effects are erectile dysfunction varying from 11 to 87% and urinary incontinence varying from 0 to 87% with a peak in functional decline shortly after surgery, and dependent on definitions. Different less frequent side effects also need to be taken into account. The highest rate of recovery is seen within the first year after RP, but even long-term improvements are possible. Nevertheless, for some men these adverse effects are long lasting and different, less frequent side effects also need to be taken into account. Despite many technical advances over the last two decades no surgical approach can be clearly favored when looking at long-term outcome, as surgical volume and experience as well as individual patient characteristics are still the most influential variables. Conclusions: The frequency of erectile function and urinary continence side effects after RP, and the trajectory of recovery, need to be taken into account when counseling patients about their treatment options for prostate cancer.
Mots-clé
adverse (side) effects, long-term outcome, prostate cancer, retropubic radical prostatectomy, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
25/06/2021 18:26
Dernière modification de la notice
23/11/2022 8:17
Données d'usage