Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Details
Download: 34760291_BIB_F5AF94A93D89.pdf (1325.92 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_F5AF94A93D89
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Journal
EFORT open reviews
ISSN
2058-5241 (Print)
ISSN-L
2058-5241
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
6
Number
10
Pages
918-931
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics.With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening.The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis.The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont's reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm.More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014.
Keywords
complication, distalization, eccentricity, glenohumeral arthritis, glenosphere size, humeral and glenoid morphology, inclination, inlay, mismatch, neck shaft angle, onlay, polyethylene, prosthesis design, replacement, shoulder pathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
03/12/2021 13:18
Last modification date
23/11/2022 7:16