Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: 34760291_BIB_F5AF94A93D89.pdf (1325.92 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_F5AF94A93D89
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Biomechanics of anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Périodique
EFORT open reviews
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Goetti P., Denard P.J., Collin P., Ibrahim M., Mazzolari A., Lädermann A.
ISSN
2058-5241 (Print)
ISSN-L
2058-5241
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
10/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
6
Numéro
10
Pages
918-931
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: epublish
Résumé
The biomechanics of the shoulder relies on careful balancing between stability and mobility. A thorough understanding of normal and degenerative shoulder anatomy is necessary, as the goal of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is to reproduce premorbid shoulder kinematics.With reported joint reaction forces up to 2.4 times bodyweight, failure to restore anatomy and therefore provide a stable fulcrum will result in early implant failure secondary to glenoid loosening.The high variability of proximal humeral anatomy can be addressed with modular stems or stemless humeral components. The development of three-dimensional planning has led to a better understanding of the complex nature of glenoid bone deformity in eccentric osteoarthritis.The treatment of cuff tear arthropathy patients was revolutionized by the arrival of Grammont's reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The initial design medialized the centre of rotation and distalized the humerus, allowing up to a 42% increase in the deltoid moment arm.More modern reverse designs have maintained the element of restored stability but sought a more anatomic postoperative position to minimize complications and maximize rotational range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:918-931. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210014.
Mots-clé
complication, distalization, eccentricity, glenohumeral arthritis, glenosphere size, humeral and glenoid morphology, inclination, inlay, mismatch, neck shaft angle, onlay, polyethylene, prosthesis design, replacement, shoulder pathology
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
03/12/2021 13:18
Dernière modification de la notice
23/11/2022 7:16
Données d'usage