A New Way to Restrict Free Leg Movement During Unilateral Vertical Jump Test.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_ED1E84811A8C
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
A New Way to Restrict Free Leg Movement During Unilateral Vertical Jump Test.
Journal
Journal of applied biomechanics
Author(s)
Schmidt C., Perroulaz M., Perez Y., Rosset J., Wüthrich G., Malatesta D., Samozino P.
ISSN
1543-2688 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1065-8483
Publication state
Published
Issued date
02/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
40
Number
1
Pages
21-28
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was (1) to test the effect of movement restriction of the free leg during unilateral vertical jump on performance and power output comparing 2 different jump techniques: flexed (Classic technique) and straight (FC Luzern technique) free leg, and (2) to test the correlation between performance and power output obtained using these 2 techniques. Twenty elite soccer players performed squat (SJ) and countermovement (CMJ) jumps on each leg. The jump height and peak power output were compared between the 2 techniques for both legs. The jump height and peak power were significantly higher for the classic test for SJ and CMJ (P < .001) with no side effects or interactions. The angular range of motion of the free leg was higher for the Classic test than for the FC Lucerne test (P < .001), with no difference in the angular range of motion of the trunk. A moderate correlation was found between the 2 techniques on peak power (SJ: r = .626; CMJ: r = .649) and jump height (SJ: r = .742; CMJ: r = .891). Consequently, FC Lucerne technique, limiting the contribution of the free leg, is more appropriate to assess lower limb strength capacities during unilateral jump test.
Keywords
jump height, jumping, lower limb strength, mechanical power, one leg
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
30/10/2023 12:21
Last modification date
13/02/2024 7:23
Usage data