A New Way to Restrict Free Leg Movement During Unilateral Vertical Jump Test.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_ED1E84811A8C
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
A New Way to Restrict Free Leg Movement During Unilateral Vertical Jump Test.
Périodique
Journal of applied biomechanics
ISSN
1543-2688 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1065-8483
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
02/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
40
Numéro
1
Pages
21-28
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this investigation was (1) to test the effect of movement restriction of the free leg during unilateral vertical jump on performance and power output comparing 2 different jump techniques: flexed (Classic technique) and straight (FC Luzern technique) free leg, and (2) to test the correlation between performance and power output obtained using these 2 techniques. Twenty elite soccer players performed squat (SJ) and countermovement (CMJ) jumps on each leg. The jump height and peak power output were compared between the 2 techniques for both legs. The jump height and peak power were significantly higher for the classic test for SJ and CMJ (P < .001) with no side effects or interactions. The angular range of motion of the free leg was higher for the Classic test than for the FC Lucerne test (P < .001), with no difference in the angular range of motion of the trunk. A moderate correlation was found between the 2 techniques on peak power (SJ: r = .626; CMJ: r = .649) and jump height (SJ: r = .742; CMJ: r = .891). Consequently, FC Lucerne technique, limiting the contribution of the free leg, is more appropriate to assess lower limb strength capacities during unilateral jump test.
Mots-clé
jump height, jumping, lower limb strength, mechanical power, one leg
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
30/10/2023 12:21
Dernière modification de la notice
13/02/2024 7:23