Pro-Con Debate: Prehospital Blood Transfusion-Should It Be Adopted for Civilian Trauma?

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_DD14FA9446FC
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Pro-Con Debate: Prehospital Blood Transfusion-Should It Be Adopted for Civilian Trauma?
Journal
Anesthesia and analgesia
Author(s)
Dudaryk R., Heim C., Ruetzler K., Pivalizza E.G.
ISSN
1526-7598 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0003-2999
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/04/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
134
Number
4
Pages
678-682
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Exsanguination is the leading cause of death in severely injured patients; nevertheless, prehospital blood transfusion (PHT) remains a controversial topic. Here, we review the pros and cons of PHT, which is now routine in treatment of military trauma patients in the civilian setting. While PHT may improve survival in those who suffer blunt injury or require prolonged transport from the site of injury, PHT for civilian trauma generally is not supported by high-quality evidence. This article was originally presented as a pro-con debate at the 2020 meeting of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Keywords
Blood Transfusion, Emergency Medical Services, Exsanguination, Humans, Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis, Wounds and Injuries/therapy, Wounds, Nonpenetrating
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
31/03/2022 20:18
Last modification date
07/11/2023 8:09
Usage data