Pro-Con Debate: Prehospital Blood Transfusion-Should It Be Adopted for Civilian Trauma?

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_DD14FA9446FC
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Pro-Con Debate: Prehospital Blood Transfusion-Should It Be Adopted for Civilian Trauma?
Périodique
Anesthesia and analgesia
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Dudaryk R., Heim C., Ruetzler K., Pivalizza E.G.
ISSN
1526-7598 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0003-2999
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/04/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
134
Numéro
4
Pages
678-682
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Exsanguination is the leading cause of death in severely injured patients; nevertheless, prehospital blood transfusion (PHT) remains a controversial topic. Here, we review the pros and cons of PHT, which is now routine in treatment of military trauma patients in the civilian setting. While PHT may improve survival in those who suffer blunt injury or require prolonged transport from the site of injury, PHT for civilian trauma generally is not supported by high-quality evidence. This article was originally presented as a pro-con debate at the 2020 meeting of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Mots-clé
Blood Transfusion, Emergency Medical Services, Exsanguination, Humans, Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis, Wounds and Injuries/therapy, Wounds, Nonpenetrating
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
31/03/2022 19:18
Dernière modification de la notice
07/11/2023 7:09
Données d'usage