Report from the HarmoSter study: different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 38205643 .pdf (747.55 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_D83302727151
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Report from the HarmoSter study: different LC-MS/MS androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone methods compare well; however, unifying calibration is a double-edged sword.
Journal
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Author(s)
Fanelli F., Peitzsch M., Bruce S., Cantù M., Temchenko A., Mezzullo M., Lindner J.M., Hawley J.M., Ackermans M.T., Van den Ouweland J., Koeppl D., Nardi E., MacKenzie F., Binz P.A., Rauh M., Keevil B.G., Vogeser M., Eisenhofer G., Heijboer A.C., Pagotto U.
ISSN
1437-4331 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1434-6621
Publication state
Published
Issued date
27/05/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
62
Number
6
Pages
1080-1091
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Comparative Study
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Current liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) applications for circulating androgen measurements are technically diverse. Previously, variable results have been reported for testosterone. Data are scarce for androstenedione and absent for dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS). We assessed the agreement of androstenedione, DHEAS and testosterone LC-MS/MS measurements among nine European centers and explored benefits of calibration system unification.
Androgens were measured twice by laboratory-specific procedures in 78 patient samples and in EQA materials. Results were obtained by in-house and external calibration. Intra- and inter-laboratory performances were valued.
Intra-laboratory CVs ranged between 4.2-13.2 % for androstenedione, 1.6-10.8 % for DHEAS, and 4.3-8.7 % and 2.6-7.1 % for female and male testosterone, respectively. Bias and trueness in EQA materials were within ±20 %. Median inter-laboratory CV with in-house vs. external calibration were 12.0 vs. 9.6 % for androstenedione (p<0.001), 7.2 vs. 4.9 % for DHEAS (p<0.001), 6.4 vs. 7.6 % for female testosterone (p<0.001) and 6.8 and 7.4 % for male testosterone (p=0.111). Median bias vs. all laboratory median with in-house and external calibration were -13.3 to 20.5 % and -4.9 to 18.7 % for androstenedione, -10.9 to 4.8 % and -3.4 to 3.5 % for DHEAS, -2.7 to 6.5 % and -11.3 to 6.6 % for testosterone in females, and -7.0 to 8.5 % and -7.5 to 11.8 % for testosterone in males, respectively.
Methods showed high intra-laboratory precision but variable bias and trueness. Inter-laboratory agreement was remarkably good. Calibration system unification improved agreement in androstenedione and DHEAS, but not in testosterone measurements. Multiple components, such as commutability of calibrators and EQA materials and internal standard choices, likely contribute to inter-laboratory variability.
Keywords
Androstenedione/blood, Androstenedione/analysis, Testosterone/blood, Testosterone/analysis, Testosterone/standards, Humans, Tandem Mass Spectrometry/standards, Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods, Calibration, Male, Female, Chromatography, Liquid/standards, Chromatography, Liquid/methods, Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate/blood, Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate/analysis, Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate/standards, Middle Aged, Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, harmonization, inter-laboratory performance, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, testosterone
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
16/01/2024 17:44
Last modification date
04/05/2024 7:18
Usage data