Investigation Delayed Is Justice Denied: Proposals for Expediting Forensic Examinations of Digital Evidence

Details

Ressource 1Download: Casey_et_al-2009-Journal_of_Forensic_Sciences.pdf (962.88 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
Serval ID
serval:BIB_D21451EE5CB5
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Investigation Delayed Is Justice Denied: Proposals for Expediting Forensic Examinations of Digital Evidence
Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Author(s)
Casey Eoghan, Ferraro Monique, Nguyen Lam
ISSN
0022-1198
1556-4029
Publication state
Published
Issued date
11/2009
Volume
54
Number
6
Pages
1353-1364
Language
english
Abstract
There is an urgent need to reduce the growing backlog of forensic examinations in Digital Forensics Laboratories (DFLs). Currently, DFLs routinely create forensic duplicates and perform in-depth forensic examinations of all submitted media. This approach is rapidly becoming untenable as more cases involve increasing quantities of digital evidence. A more efficient and effective three-tiered strategy for performing forensic examinations will enable DFLs to produce useful results in a timely manner at different phases of an investigation, and will reduce unnecessary expenditure of resources on less serious matters. The three levels of forensic examination are described along with practical examples and suitable tools. Realizing that this is not simply a technical problem, we address the need to update training and establish thresholds in DFLs. Threshold considerations include the likelihood of missing exculpatory evidence and seriousness of the offense. We conclude with the implications of scaling forensic examinations to the investigation.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
16/01/2019 23:31
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:52
Usage data