Investigation Delayed Is Justice Denied: Proposals for Expediting Forensic Examinations of Digital Evidence

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: Casey_et_al-2009-Journal_of_Forensic_Sciences.pdf (962.88 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
ID Serval
serval:BIB_D21451EE5CB5
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Investigation Delayed Is Justice Denied: Proposals for Expediting Forensic Examinations of Digital Evidence
Périodique
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Casey Eoghan, Ferraro Monique, Nguyen Lam
ISSN
0022-1198
1556-4029
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
11/2009
Volume
54
Numéro
6
Pages
1353-1364
Langue
anglais
Résumé
There is an urgent need to reduce the growing backlog of forensic examinations in Digital Forensics Laboratories (DFLs). Currently, DFLs routinely create forensic duplicates and perform in-depth forensic examinations of all submitted media. This approach is rapidly becoming untenable as more cases involve increasing quantities of digital evidence. A more efficient and effective three-tiered strategy for performing forensic examinations will enable DFLs to produce useful results in a timely manner at different phases of an investigation, and will reduce unnecessary expenditure of resources on less serious matters. The three levels of forensic examination are described along with practical examples and suitable tools. Realizing that this is not simply a technical problem, we address the need to update training and establish thresholds in DFLs. Threshold considerations include the likelihood of missing exculpatory evidence and seriousness of the offense. We conclude with the implications of scaling forensic examinations to the investigation.
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
16/01/2019 23:31
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:52
Données d'usage