Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_B0B047E147BD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients.
Journal
International Urology and Nephrology
Author(s)
Chazot C., Farrington K., Nistor I., Van Biesen W., Joosten H., Teta D., Siriopol D., Covic A.
ISSN
1573-2584 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0301-1623
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
47
Number
11
Pages
1809-1816
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
In the last decade, an increasing number of patients over 75 years of age are starting renal replacement therapy. Frailty is highly prevalent in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the context of the increased prevalence of some ESRD-associated conditions: protein-energy wasting, inflammation, anaemia, acidosis or hormonal disturbances. There are currently no hard data to support guidance on the optimal duration of dialysis for frail/elderly ESRD patients. The current debate is not about starting dialysis or managing conservatory frail ESRD patients, but whether a more intensive regimen once dialysis is initiated (for whatever reasons and circumstances) would improve patients' outcome. The most important issue is that all studies performed with extended/alternative dialysis regimens do not specifically address this particular type of patients and therefore all the inferences are derived from the general ESRD population. Care planning should be responsive to end-of-life needs whatever the treatment modality. Care in this setting should focus on symptom control and quality of life rather than life extension. We conclude that, similar to the general dialysed population, extensive application of more intensive dialysis schedules is not based on solid evidence. However, after a thorough clinical evaluation, a limited period of a trial of intensive dialysis could be prescribed in more problematic patients.
Keywords
Aged, Frail Elderly, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy, Patient Care Planning, Renal Dialysis/adverse effects, Renal Dialysis/methods, Time Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
01/12/2015 18:48
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:19
Usage data