Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_B0B047E147BD
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Pro and con arguments in using alternative dialysis regimens in the frail and elderly patients.
Périodique
International Urology and Nephrology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Chazot C., Farrington K., Nistor I., Van Biesen W., Joosten H., Teta D., Siriopol D., Covic A.
ISSN
1573-2584 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0301-1623
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
47
Numéro
11
Pages
1809-1816
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
In the last decade, an increasing number of patients over 75 years of age are starting renal replacement therapy. Frailty is highly prevalent in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the context of the increased prevalence of some ESRD-associated conditions: protein-energy wasting, inflammation, anaemia, acidosis or hormonal disturbances. There are currently no hard data to support guidance on the optimal duration of dialysis for frail/elderly ESRD patients. The current debate is not about starting dialysis or managing conservatory frail ESRD patients, but whether a more intensive regimen once dialysis is initiated (for whatever reasons and circumstances) would improve patients' outcome. The most important issue is that all studies performed with extended/alternative dialysis regimens do not specifically address this particular type of patients and therefore all the inferences are derived from the general ESRD population. Care planning should be responsive to end-of-life needs whatever the treatment modality. Care in this setting should focus on symptom control and quality of life rather than life extension. We conclude that, similar to the general dialysed population, extensive application of more intensive dialysis schedules is not based on solid evidence. However, after a thorough clinical evaluation, a limited period of a trial of intensive dialysis could be prescribed in more problematic patients.
Mots-clé
Aged, Frail Elderly, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy, Patient Care Planning, Renal Dialysis/adverse effects, Renal Dialysis/methods, Time Factors
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
01/12/2015 18:48
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:19
Données d'usage