The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 33184313_BIB_A402EF8C6913.pdf (2756.09 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A402EF8C6913
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The importance of feature aggregation in radiomics: a head and neck cancer study.
Journal
Scientific reports
Author(s)
Fontaine P., Acosta O., Castelli J., De Crevoisier R., Müller H., Depeursinge A.
ISSN
2045-2322 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2045-2322
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/11/2020
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
10
Number
1
Pages
19679
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
In standard radiomics studies the features extracted from clinical images are mostly quantified with simple statistics such as the average or variance per Region of Interest (ROI). Such approaches may smooth out any intra-region heterogeneity and thus hide some tumor aggressiveness that may hamper predictions. In this paper we study the importance of feature aggregation within the standard radiomics workflow, which allows to take into account intra-region variations. Feature aggregation methods transform a collection of voxel values from feature response maps (over a ROI) into one or several scalar values that are usable for statistical or machine learning algorithms. This important step has been little investigated within the radiomics workflows, so far. In this paper, we compare several aggregation methods with standard radiomics approaches in order to assess the improvements in prediction capabilities. We evaluate the performance using an aggregation function based on Bags of Visual Words (BoVW), which allows for the preservation of piece-wise homogeneous information within heterogeneous regions and compared with standard methods. The different models are compared on a cohort of 214 head and neck cancer patients coming from 4 medical centers. Radiomics features were extracted from manually delineated tumors in clinical PET-FDG and CT images were analyzed. We compared the performance of standard radiomics models, the volume of the ROI alone and the BoVW model for survival analysis. The average concordance index was estimated with a five fold cross-validation. The performance was significantly better using the BoVW model 0.627 (95% CI: 0.616-0.637) as compared to standard radiomics0.505 (95% CI: 0.499-0.511), mean-var. 0.543 (95% CI: 0.536-0.549), mean0.547 (95% CI: 0.541-0.554), var.0.530 (95% CI: 0.524-0.536) or volume 0.577 (95% CI: 0.571-0.582). We conclude that classical aggregation methods are not optimal in case of heterogeneous tumors. We also showed that the BoVW model is a better alternative to extract consistent features in the presence of lesions composed of heterogeneous tissue.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
23/11/2020 16:07
Last modification date
11/10/2023 7:14
Usage data