Microhabitat selection and distribution of functional feeding groups of mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) in lotic karst habitats

Details

Ressource 1Download: kmae170142.pdf (1864.98 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_A0A62C733F81
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Microhabitat selection and distribution of functional feeding groups of mayfly larvae (Ephemeroptera) in lotic karst habitats
Journal
Knowledge & Management of Aquatic Ecosystems
Author(s)
Vilenica M., Brigić A., Sartori M., Mihaljević Z.
ISSN
1961-9502
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Number
419
Pages
17
Language
english
Abstract
Research examining mayfly ecology in karst streams and rivers has increased in recent years, though microhabitat preferences remain poorly characterized. We examined mayfly assemblage taxonomy, functional feeding groups and microhabitat preferences in two contrasting lotic Dinaric karst catchments, one pristine and one anthropogenically impacted. At monthly intervals over a one-year period, all major microhabitats (i.e. dominated by boulders, cobbles, sand, silt, mosses, or angiosperms) were sampled at sites spanning springs, upper, middle and lower river reaches, and tufa barriers. In both catchments, mayfly species richness was comparable among microhabitats, while mayfly abundance was highest on mosses and lowest on silt. NMDS ordination did not group assemblages according to microhabitat type, which may reflect the greater influence of physical and chemical water properties. In both catchments and all microhabitats, mayfly assemblages were dominated by grazers/scrapers at upstream sites and by detritivores at downstream sites. Active filter feeders were more abundant in microhabitats with silt substrates and lower current velocities. This study demonstrated that certain mayfly species strongly preferred a specific microhabitat type, reflecting their water current preferences and feeding strategies, while other species shifted between microhabitats, likely in search of food resources and shelter. The results emphasize the importance of habitat heterogeneity in supporting diverse communities in karst rivers.
Keywords
Substrate type, water velocity, water depth, mayfly assemblages, feeding groups
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
10/09/2018 14:20
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:06
Usage data