Advantages of patient-specific cutting guides with disposable instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a case control study.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 33722256_BIB_93BCBE526A8A.pdf (6222.37 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_93BCBE526A8A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Advantages of patient-specific cutting guides with disposable instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a case control study.
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
Author(s)
Moerenhout K., Allami B., Gkagkalis G., Guyen O., Jolles B.M.
ISSN
1749-799X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1749-799X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
15/03/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
16
Number
1
Pages
188
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is most frequently planned using conventional two-dimensional weight-bearing lower limb radiographs and is performed with conventional femoral and tibial cutting guides. Questions have been raised about the accuracy of conventional TKA instrumentation and planning for an anatomically standard or complex joint. Use of computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating and patient-specific cutting guides printed in 3D has shown improved postoperative lower limb alignment parameters. This case-control study compared costs and operative times of using CT-based, patient-specific, single-use instruments versus conventional metal instruments for TKA.
In this case-control, retrospective chart review, all TKAs were performed by one senior surgeon, using the F.I.R.S.T. posterior-stabilised knee prosthesis (Symbios, CH), with a similar protocol and identical operating room setup. Group A included 51 TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting guides and conventional metal instruments. Group B included 49 TKAs performed with patient-specific cutting guides and patient-specific, single-use instrumentation. Operation duration, number of instrumentation trays and sterilisation costs were evaluated.
The groups were similar for age, body mass index, hip-knee-ankle angle and operation duration. The mean number of instrumentation trays was 8.0 ± 0.8 for group A (controls) and 5.1 ± 0.9 for group B (p<0.001). The mean sterilisation costs were 380 ± 47 Swiss Francs (CHF) for group A and 243 ± 55 CHF for group B (p<0.001), for a mean cost reduction of 130.50 CHF per intervention in group B. The time interval between two consecutive surgeries was 24 min for group A and 18 min for group B. There were no adverse events or complications, instrument-related or otherwise.
Compared to conventional instrumentation, use of patient-specific, single-use instruments for TKA reduced the number of instrumentation trays by more than one-third and saved 36% in sterilisation costs. If fabrication costs of single-use instruments are included by the company, the total cost is significantly diminished. There was no operative time advantage for single-use instrumentation.
Keywords
Disposable instrumentation, Operative time, Patient-specific cutting guide, Patient-specific instrumentation, Single-use, Sterilisation cost, Total knee arthroplasty
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
27/03/2021 15:36
Last modification date
25/10/2023 6:10
Usage data