Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Details

Ressource 1Request a copy Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: Not specified
Secondary document(s)
Under indefinite embargo.
UNIL restricted access
State: Public
Version: author
License: Not specified
Serval ID
serval:BIB_875CD9FC3E28
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Journal
The British journal of surgery
Author(s)
Grass F., Vuagniaux A., Teixeira Farinha H., Lehmann K., Demartines N., Hübner M.
ISSN
1365-2168 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0007-1323
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
104
Number
6
Pages
669-678
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally invasive approach under investigation as a novel treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of various origins. The aim was to review the available evidence on mechanisms, clinical effects and risks.
This was a systematic review of the literature on pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy published between January 2000 and October 2016. All types of scientific report were included.
Twenty-nine relevant papers were identified; 16 were preclinical studies and 13 were clinical reports. The overall quality of the clinical studies was modest; five studies were prospective and there was no randomized trial. Preclinical data suggested better distribution and higher tissue concentrations of chemotherapy agents in PIPAC compared with conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy by lavage. Regarding technical feasibility, laparoscopic access and repeatability rates were 83-100 and 38-82 per cent. Surgery-related complications occurred in up to 12 per cent. Postoperative morbidity was low (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-5 events reported in 0-37 per cent), and hospital stay was about 3 days. No negative impact on quality of life was reported. Histological response rates for therapy-resistant carcinomatosis of ovarian, colorectal and gastric origin were 62-88, 71-86 and 70-100 per cent respectively.
PIPAC is feasible, safe and well tolerated. Preliminary good response rates call for prospective analysis of oncological efficacy.
Keywords
Aerosols, Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage, Carcinoma/drug therapy, Carcinoma/surgery, Combined Modality Therapy, Epidemiologic Methods, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy, Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery, Pressure, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
29/04/2017 17:39
Last modification date
28/10/2023 7:10
Usage data