Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Détails

Ressource 1Demande d'une copie Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: Non spécifiée
Document(s) secondaire(s)
Sous embargo indéterminé.
Accès restreint UNIL
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
Licence: Non spécifiée
ID Serval
serval:BIB_875CD9FC3E28
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Périodique
The British journal of surgery
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Grass F., Vuagniaux A., Teixeira Farinha H., Lehmann K., Demartines N., Hübner M.
ISSN
1365-2168 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0007-1323
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
104
Numéro
6
Pages
669-678
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally invasive approach under investigation as a novel treatment for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of various origins. The aim was to review the available evidence on mechanisms, clinical effects and risks.
This was a systematic review of the literature on pressurized intraperitoneal chemotherapy published between January 2000 and October 2016. All types of scientific report were included.
Twenty-nine relevant papers were identified; 16 were preclinical studies and 13 were clinical reports. The overall quality of the clinical studies was modest; five studies were prospective and there was no randomized trial. Preclinical data suggested better distribution and higher tissue concentrations of chemotherapy agents in PIPAC compared with conventional intraperitoneal chemotherapy by lavage. Regarding technical feasibility, laparoscopic access and repeatability rates were 83-100 and 38-82 per cent. Surgery-related complications occurred in up to 12 per cent. Postoperative morbidity was low (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3-5 events reported in 0-37 per cent), and hospital stay was about 3 days. No negative impact on quality of life was reported. Histological response rates for therapy-resistant carcinomatosis of ovarian, colorectal and gastric origin were 62-88, 71-86 and 70-100 per cent respectively.
PIPAC is feasible, safe and well tolerated. Preliminary good response rates call for prospective analysis of oncological efficacy.
Mots-clé
Aerosols, Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage, Carcinoma/drug therapy, Carcinoma/surgery, Combined Modality Therapy, Epidemiologic Methods, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Peritoneal Neoplasms/drug therapy, Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery, Pressure, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
29/04/2017 17:39
Dernière modification de la notice
28/10/2023 7:10
Données d'usage