Microscopically positive resection margin after hepatoblastoma resection: what is the impact on prognosis? A Childhood Liver Tumours Strategy Group (SIOPEL) report.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_6DF45F519A5A
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Microscopically positive resection margin after hepatoblastoma resection: what is the impact on prognosis? A Childhood Liver Tumours Strategy Group (SIOPEL) report.
Journal
European journal of cancer
Author(s)
Aronson D.C., Weeda V.B., Maibach R., Czauderna P., Dall'Igna P., de Ville de Goyet J., Branchereau S., Perilongo G., Brock P., Zsiros J., Semeraro M., Chardot C., Wildhaber B., Morland B., Brugières L.
Working group(s)
Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group (SIOPEL)
ISSN
1879-0852 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0959-8049
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
106
Pages
126-132
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of a microscopically positive resection margin (microPRM) on the outcome of hepatoblastoma patients pretreated with chemotherapy.
Local recurrence and survival rates of 431 children treated in the SIOPEL 2 and 3 trials were analysed comparing 58 patients with microPRM with 371 who had a complete resection (CR) and who were then stratified by risk category. The tumour was standard-risk in 312 patients and high-risk (PRETEXT IV and/or extrahepatic disease and/or α-fetoprotein [AFP]<100 ng/ml) in 117 patients. All received cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy as per protocol. Apart from one microPRM patient who went on to transplant, none received any additional local treatment.
With a median follow-up of 67 months, local relapse occurred in 3/58 patients with microPRM (5%) and in 23/371 (6%) patients with CR. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80%-96%) for the microPRM and 92% (95% CI 89%-95%) for the CR group. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 86% (95% CI 74%-93%) for the microPRM and 86% (95% CI 82%-89%) for the CR group. Neither OS nor EFS was statistically significantly different between the two groups, neither overall nor when risk group stratified.
In the context of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the presence of microPRM did not influence the outcome even without additional local treatment. Although CR remains the aim, microPRM does not necessitate mandatory second look surgery. A 'wait and see policy' is warranted if postoperative chemotherapy is administered and AFP levels and imaging become normal.
Keywords
Children, Hepatoblastoma, Outcome, Partial liver resection, Positive margin
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
30/01/2020 16:18
Last modification date
31/01/2020 7:26
Usage data