Microscopically positive resection margin after hepatoblastoma resection: what is the impact on prognosis? A Childhood Liver Tumours Strategy Group (SIOPEL) report.
Détails
ID Serval
serval:BIB_6DF45F519A5A
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Microscopically positive resection margin after hepatoblastoma resection: what is the impact on prognosis? A Childhood Liver Tumours Strategy Group (SIOPEL) report.
Périodique
European journal of cancer
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group (SIOPEL)
ISSN
1879-0852 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0959-8049
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
01/2019
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
106
Pages
126-132
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the impact of a microscopically positive resection margin (microPRM) on the outcome of hepatoblastoma patients pretreated with chemotherapy.
Local recurrence and survival rates of 431 children treated in the SIOPEL 2 and 3 trials were analysed comparing 58 patients with microPRM with 371 who had a complete resection (CR) and who were then stratified by risk category. The tumour was standard-risk in 312 patients and high-risk (PRETEXT IV and/or extrahepatic disease and/or α-fetoprotein [AFP]<100 ng/ml) in 117 patients. All received cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy as per protocol. Apart from one microPRM patient who went on to transplant, none received any additional local treatment.
With a median follow-up of 67 months, local relapse occurred in 3/58 patients with microPRM (5%) and in 23/371 (6%) patients with CR. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80%-96%) for the microPRM and 92% (95% CI 89%-95%) for the CR group. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 86% (95% CI 74%-93%) for the microPRM and 86% (95% CI 82%-89%) for the CR group. Neither OS nor EFS was statistically significantly different between the two groups, neither overall nor when risk group stratified.
In the context of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the presence of microPRM did not influence the outcome even without additional local treatment. Although CR remains the aim, microPRM does not necessitate mandatory second look surgery. A 'wait and see policy' is warranted if postoperative chemotherapy is administered and AFP levels and imaging become normal.
Local recurrence and survival rates of 431 children treated in the SIOPEL 2 and 3 trials were analysed comparing 58 patients with microPRM with 371 who had a complete resection (CR) and who were then stratified by risk category. The tumour was standard-risk in 312 patients and high-risk (PRETEXT IV and/or extrahepatic disease and/or α-fetoprotein [AFP]<100 ng/ml) in 117 patients. All received cisplatinum-based neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy as per protocol. Apart from one microPRM patient who went on to transplant, none received any additional local treatment.
With a median follow-up of 67 months, local relapse occurred in 3/58 patients with microPRM (5%) and in 23/371 (6%) patients with CR. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 80%-96%) for the microPRM and 92% (95% CI 89%-95%) for the CR group. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 86% (95% CI 74%-93%) for the microPRM and 86% (95% CI 82%-89%) for the CR group. Neither OS nor EFS was statistically significantly different between the two groups, neither overall nor when risk group stratified.
In the context of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the presence of microPRM did not influence the outcome even without additional local treatment. Although CR remains the aim, microPRM does not necessitate mandatory second look surgery. A 'wait and see policy' is warranted if postoperative chemotherapy is administered and AFP levels and imaging become normal.
Mots-clé
Children, Hepatoblastoma, Outcome, Partial liver resection, Positive margin
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
30/01/2020 15:18
Dernière modification de la notice
31/01/2020 6:26