Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_54D4C4FBC230
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review
Journal
Adm Policy Ment Health
Author(s)
Gondek D., Edbrooke-Childs J., Fink E., Deighton J., Wolpert M.
ISSN
1573-3289 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0894-587X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
43
Number
3
Pages
325-43
Language
english
Notes
Gondek, Dawid
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
Fink, Elian
Deighton, Jessica
Wolpert, Miranda
eng
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 May;43(3):325-43. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5.
Abstract
Due to recent increases in the use of feedback from outcome measures in mental health settings, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the impact of feedback from outcome measures on treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice. In over half of 32 studies reviewed, the feedback condition had significantly higher levels of treatment effectiveness on at least one treatment outcome variable. Feedback was particularly effective for not-on-track patients or when it was provided to both clinicians and patients. The findings for treatment efficiency and collaborative practice were less consistent. Given the heterogeneity of studies, more research is needed to determine when and for whom feedback is most effective.
Keywords
Cooperative Behavior, *Feedback, Humans, Mental Disorders/*therapy, *Mental Health Services, *Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Collaboratve practice, Feedback, Outcome evaluation, Outcome management, Outcome measures
Pubmed
Create date
28/09/2023 8:29
Last modification date
10/10/2023 10:50
Usage data