Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_54D4C4FBC230
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review
Périodique
Adm Policy Ment Health
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Gondek D., Edbrooke-Childs J., Fink E., Deighton J., Wolpert M.
ISSN
1573-3289 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0894-587X
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
43
Numéro
3
Pages
325-43
Langue
anglais
Notes
Gondek, Dawid
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
Fink, Elian
Deighton, Jessica
Wolpert, Miranda
eng
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Systematic Review
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 May;43(3):325-43. doi: 10.1007/s10488-015-0710-5.
Résumé
Due to recent increases in the use of feedback from outcome measures in mental health settings, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the impact of feedback from outcome measures on treatment effectiveness, treatment efficiency, and collaborative practice. In over half of 32 studies reviewed, the feedback condition had significantly higher levels of treatment effectiveness on at least one treatment outcome variable. Feedback was particularly effective for not-on-track patients or when it was provided to both clinicians and patients. The findings for treatment efficiency and collaborative practice were less consistent. Given the heterogeneity of studies, more research is needed to determine when and for whom feedback is most effective.
Mots-clé
Cooperative Behavior, *Feedback, Humans, Mental Disorders/*therapy, *Mental Health Services, *Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Collaboratve practice, Feedback, Outcome evaluation, Outcome management, Outcome measures
Pubmed
Création de la notice
28/09/2023 7:29
Dernière modification de la notice
10/10/2023 9:50
Données d'usage