Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331<sup>☆</sup>.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_4545F4DBDC90
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331<sup>☆</sup>.
Journal
Annals of oncology
Author(s)
Spigel D.R., Vicente D., Ciuleanu T.E., Gettinger S., Peters S., Horn L., Audigier-Valette C., Pardo Aranda N., Juan-Vidal O., Cheng Y., Zhang H., Shi M., Luft A., Wolf J., Antonia S., Nakagawa K., Fairchild J., Baudelet C., Pandya D., Doshi P., Chang H., Reck M.
ISSN
1569-8041 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0923-7534
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Number
5
Pages
631-641
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal survival. Phase I/II data show activity of nivolumab in previously treated SCLC.
CheckMate 331 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of nivolumab versus standard chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Patients with relapse after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (topotecan or amrubicin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
Overall, 284 patients were randomized to nivolumab and 285 to chemotherapy. Minimum follow-up was 15.8 months. No significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab versus chemotherapy [median OS, 7.5 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.11]. A survival benefit with nivolumab was suggested in patients with baseline lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal and in those without baseline liver metastases. OS (nivolumab versus chemotherapy) was similar in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1% versus <1%. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 versus 3.8 months (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.69). Objective response rate was 13.7% versus 16.5% (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.27); median duration of response was 8.3 versus 4.5 months. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were 13.8% versus 73.2%.
Nivolumab did not improve survival versus chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. No new safety signals were seen. In exploratory analyses, select baseline characteristics were associated with improved OS for nivolumab.
Keywords
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy, Nivolumab/adverse effects, Progression-Free Survival, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy, PD-1, biomarkers, immunotherapy, small-cell lung cancer
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
23/02/2021 9:28
Last modification date
19/11/2021 7:40
Usage data