Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331<sup>☆</sup>.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_4545F4DBDC90
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Sous-type
Synthèse (review): revue aussi complète que possible des connaissances sur un sujet, rédigée à partir de l'analyse exhaustive des travaux publiés.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Second-line nivolumab in relapsed small-cell lung cancer: CheckMate 331<sup>☆</sup>.
Périodique
Annals of oncology
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Spigel D.R., Vicente D., Ciuleanu T.E., Gettinger S., Peters S., Horn L., Audigier-Valette C., Pardo Aranda N., Juan-Vidal O., Cheng Y., Zhang H., Shi M., Luft A., Wolf J., Antonia S., Nakagawa K., Fairchild J., Baudelet C., Pandya D., Doshi P., Chang H., Reck M.
ISSN
1569-8041 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0923-7534
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2021
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Numéro
5
Pages
631-641
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal survival. Phase I/II data show activity of nivolumab in previously treated SCLC.
CheckMate 331 is a randomized, open-label, phase III trial of nivolumab versus standard chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Patients with relapse after first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks or chemotherapy (topotecan or amrubicin) until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
Overall, 284 patients were randomized to nivolumab and 285 to chemotherapy. Minimum follow-up was 15.8 months. No significant improvement in OS was seen with nivolumab versus chemotherapy [median OS, 7.5 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.04; P = 0.11]. A survival benefit with nivolumab was suggested in patients with baseline lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal and in those without baseline liver metastases. OS (nivolumab versus chemotherapy) was similar in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1% versus <1%. Median progression-free survival was 1.4 versus 3.8 months (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.69). Objective response rate was 13.7% versus 16.5% (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.50-1.27); median duration of response was 8.3 versus 4.5 months. Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were 13.8% versus 73.2%.
Nivolumab did not improve survival versus chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. No new safety signals were seen. In exploratory analyses, select baseline characteristics were associated with improved OS for nivolumab.
Mots-clé
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy, Nivolumab/adverse effects, Progression-Free Survival, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/drug therapy, PD-1, biomarkers, immunotherapy, small-cell lung cancer
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
23/02/2021 8:28
Dernière modification de la notice
19/11/2021 6:40
Données d'usage