Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_3806FB7C25F8
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience.
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions
Author(s)
Pedrazzini G.B., Radovanovic D., Vassalli G., Sürder D., Moccetti T., Eberli F., Urban P., Windecker S., Rickli H., Erne P.
Working group(s)
AMIS Plus Investigators
ISSN
1876-7605 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1876-7605
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2011
Volume
4
Number
6
Pages
627-633
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease.
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing LM PCI.
METHODS: Of 9,075 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) Plus registry between 2005 and June 30, 2010, 6,666 underwent primary PCI. Of them, 348 (5.2%; mean age: 63.5 ± 12.6 years) underwent LM PCI, either isolated (n = 208) or concomitant to PCI for other vessel segments (n = 140). They were compared with 6,318 patients (94.8%; mean age: 61.9 ± 12.5 years) undergoing PCI of non-LM vessel segments only.
RESULTS: The LM patients had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (12.2% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (10.6% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.01), in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (12.4% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001) than non-LM PCI. Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were highest for concurrent LM and non-LM PCI (17.9% and 18.6%, respectively), intermediate for isolated LM PCI (6.3% and 8.3%, respectively), and lowest for non-LM PCI (3.8% and 5.0%, respectively). Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events for LM PCI were higher than for non-LM multivessel PCI (10.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, and 12.4% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). LM disease independently predicted in-hospital death (odds ratio: 2.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 4.17; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Emergent LM PCI in the context of acute myocardial infarction, even including 12% cardiogenic shock, appears to have a remarkably high (89%) in-hospital survival. Concurrent LM and non-LM PCI has worse outcomes than isolated LM PCI.
Keywords
Aged, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods, Confidence Intervals, Coronary Angiography, Female, Health Status Indicators, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Myocardial Infarction/complications, Myocardial Infarction/mortality, Odds Ratio, Questionnaires, Registries, Risk Factors, Shock, Cardiogenic, Statistics, Nonparametric, Switzerland, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
06/02/2013 9:36
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:26
Usage data