Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience.

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_3806FB7C25F8
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience.
Périodique
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Pedrazzini G.B., Radovanovic D., Vassalli G., Sürder D., Moccetti T., Eberli F., Urban P., Windecker S., Rickli H., Erne P.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
AMIS Plus Investigators
ISSN
1876-7605 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1876-7605
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2011
Volume
4
Numéro
6
Pages
627-633
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main (LM) disease.
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing LM PCI.
METHODS: Of 9,075 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) Plus registry between 2005 and June 30, 2010, 6,666 underwent primary PCI. Of them, 348 (5.2%; mean age: 63.5 ± 12.6 years) underwent LM PCI, either isolated (n = 208) or concomitant to PCI for other vessel segments (n = 140). They were compared with 6,318 patients (94.8%; mean age: 61.9 ± 12.5 years) undergoing PCI of non-LM vessel segments only.
RESULTS: The LM patients had higher rates of cardiogenic shock (12.2% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (10.6% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.01), in-hospital mortality (10.9% vs. 3.8%; p < 0.001), and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (12.4% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001) than non-LM PCI. Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were highest for concurrent LM and non-LM PCI (17.9% and 18.6%, respectively), intermediate for isolated LM PCI (6.3% and 8.3%, respectively), and lowest for non-LM PCI (3.8% and 5.0%, respectively). Rates of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events for LM PCI were higher than for non-LM multivessel PCI (10.9% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001, and 12.4% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). LM disease independently predicted in-hospital death (odds ratio: 2.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.34 to 4.17; p = 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Emergent LM PCI in the context of acute myocardial infarction, even including 12% cardiogenic shock, appears to have a remarkably high (89%) in-hospital survival. Concurrent LM and non-LM PCI has worse outcomes than isolated LM PCI.
Mots-clé
Aged, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods, Confidence Intervals, Coronary Angiography, Female, Health Status Indicators, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Myocardial Infarction/complications, Myocardial Infarction/mortality, Odds Ratio, Questionnaires, Registries, Risk Factors, Shock, Cardiogenic, Statistics, Nonparametric, Switzerland, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
06/02/2013 10:36
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 14:26
Données d'usage