Compliance with recommended Varroa destructor treatment regimens improves the survival of honey bee colonies over winter.

Details

Ressource 1Download: varroa 2022 control alternative method compliance Hernandez RVS22 corrected.pdf (3071.16 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_3135CF9D9F13
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Compliance with recommended Varroa destructor treatment regimens improves the survival of honey bee colonies over winter.
Journal
Research in veterinary science
Author(s)
Hernandez J., Hattendorf J., Aebi A., Dietemann V.
ISSN
1532-2661 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0034-5288
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
144
Pages
1-10
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor affects honey bee colony health and survival negatively, thus compelling beekeepers to treat their colonies every year. A broadly used mite control regimen is based on two organic molecules: formic and oxalic acids. To ensure optimal efficiency, several applications of these acids at pre-defined time points are recommended. These recommendations are mainly based on experiments conducted under controlled conditions. Studies evaluating the effectiveness under natural field conditions are lacking. We enrolled 30 beekeepers in a longitudinal study in three cantons in Switzerland and monitored the management and health of their colonies for two years. We assessed compliance with mite control recommendations and measured V. destructor infestation rates, indexes of colony productivity (brood size and honey harvest), and colony mortality in 300 colonies. We observed a 10-fold increased risk of colony death when beekeepers deviated slightly from the recommended treatment regimen compared to compliant beekeepers (odds ratio: 11.9, 95% CI: 2.6-55.2, p = 0.002). The risk of colony death increased 25-fold in apiaries with substantial deviations from the recommendations (odds ratio: 50.4, 95% CI: 9.7-262.5, p < 0.0001). The deviations led to increased levels of V. destructor infestation ahead of wintering, which was likely responsible for colony mortality. After communicating the apparent link between low compliance and poor colony survival at the end of the first year to the beekeepers, we observed better compliance and colony survival in the second year. Our results highlight the positive impact of compliance with the recommended V. destructor treatment regimen on the health of honeybee colonies and the need to better communicate the consequences of deviating from the recommendations to improve compliance. Compliance also occasionally decreased, which hints at concept implementation constraints that could be identified and possibly addressed in detail with the help of social sciences to further promote honey bee health.
Keywords
Animals, Beekeeping/methods, Bees/parasitology, Ectoparasitic Infestations/prevention & control, Ectoparasitic Infestations/veterinary, Longitudinal Studies, Seasons, Switzerland, Varroidae/pathogenicity, Apis mellifera, Beekeeping management, Colony mortality, Compliance, Pest control, Varroa destructor
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
25/01/2022 7:21
Last modification date
20/07/2023 6:09
Usage data