Compliance with recommended Varroa destructor treatment regimens improves the survival of honey bee colonies over winter.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: varroa 2022 control alternative method compliance Hernandez RVS22 corrected.pdf (3071.16 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_3135CF9D9F13
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
Compliance with recommended Varroa destructor treatment regimens improves the survival of honey bee colonies over winter.
Périodique
Research in veterinary science
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Hernandez J., Hattendorf J., Aebi A., Dietemann V.
ISSN
1532-2661 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0034-5288
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
05/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
144
Pages
1-10
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor affects honey bee colony health and survival negatively, thus compelling beekeepers to treat their colonies every year. A broadly used mite control regimen is based on two organic molecules: formic and oxalic acids. To ensure optimal efficiency, several applications of these acids at pre-defined time points are recommended. These recommendations are mainly based on experiments conducted under controlled conditions. Studies evaluating the effectiveness under natural field conditions are lacking. We enrolled 30 beekeepers in a longitudinal study in three cantons in Switzerland and monitored the management and health of their colonies for two years. We assessed compliance with mite control recommendations and measured V. destructor infestation rates, indexes of colony productivity (brood size and honey harvest), and colony mortality in 300 colonies. We observed a 10-fold increased risk of colony death when beekeepers deviated slightly from the recommended treatment regimen compared to compliant beekeepers (odds ratio: 11.9, 95% CI: 2.6-55.2, p = 0.002). The risk of colony death increased 25-fold in apiaries with substantial deviations from the recommendations (odds ratio: 50.4, 95% CI: 9.7-262.5, p < 0.0001). The deviations led to increased levels of V. destructor infestation ahead of wintering, which was likely responsible for colony mortality. After communicating the apparent link between low compliance and poor colony survival at the end of the first year to the beekeepers, we observed better compliance and colony survival in the second year. Our results highlight the positive impact of compliance with the recommended V. destructor treatment regimen on the health of honeybee colonies and the need to better communicate the consequences of deviating from the recommendations to improve compliance. Compliance also occasionally decreased, which hints at concept implementation constraints that could be identified and possibly addressed in detail with the help of social sciences to further promote honey bee health.
Mots-clé
Animals, Beekeeping/methods, Bees/parasitology, Ectoparasitic Infestations/prevention & control, Ectoparasitic Infestations/veterinary, Longitudinal Studies, Seasons, Switzerland, Varroidae/pathogenicity, Apis mellifera, Beekeeping management, Colony mortality, Compliance, Pest control, Varroa destructor
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
25/01/2022 8:21
Dernière modification de la notice
20/07/2023 7:09
Données d'usage