Which femoral neck for a dual mobility cup? A biomechanical evaluation.

Details

Ressource 1Download: Wegrzyn2022_Article_WhichFemoralNeckForADualMobili.pdf (1698.37 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_19F634E310A6
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Which femoral neck for a dual mobility cup? A biomechanical evaluation.
Journal
International orthopaedics
Author(s)
Wegrzyn J., Longaray J., Baez R., Herrera L.
ISSN
1432-5195 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0341-2695
Publication state
Published
Issued date
08/2022
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
46
Number
8
Pages
1783-1793
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate polyethylene (PE) damage and wear lesions to the chamfer of mobile components under mobile and fixed femoral neck impingement at the third articulation, and to determine which femoral neck characteristics should be considered with a dual mobility cup to limit those lesions.
Two femoral neck geometries (cylindrical and quadrangular) with two surface finishing roughness (rough and polished), and two head-to-neck ratios (28- and 22.2-mm diameter femoral heads) were evaluated in a hip simulator testing. For each characteristic, six femoral necks were tested with six dual mobility cups under fixed and mobile femoral neck impingement conditions. Chamfer PE damage and volumetric wear were evaluated and compared for each femoral neck characteristic and impingement condition.
Under mobile impingement condition, femoral neck characteristics did not significantly affect PE damage and wear lesions to the chamfer (p = 0.283 to 0.810). However, under fixed impingement condition, significantly higher PE damage and wear lesions to the chamfer were produced by the quadrangular geometry compared to the cylindrical geometry (p = 0.004 to 0.025). In addition, with the quadrangular geometry, rough surface finishing was demonstrated to increase volumetric wear of the chamfer (p = 0.009). No significant influence of head-to-neck ratio was observed on PE damage and wear lesions to the chamfer (p = 0.244 to 0.714).
This biomechanical study emphasized that femoral neck characteristics are critical with dual mobility cup and tend to favor a cylindrical geometry particularly whether fixed impingement at the third articulation occurs.
Keywords
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Femur Neck/surgery, Hip Prosthesis, Humans, Polyethylene, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Dual mobility cup, Femoral neck, Impingement, Polyethylene wear, Third articulation
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Funding(s)
University of Lausanne
Create date
17/05/2022 13:06
Last modification date
21/11/2022 8:30
Usage data