Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography : a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_130CBE0227E3.P001.pdf (1006.05 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_130CBE0227E3
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography : a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.
Journal
European Journal of Cancer (oxford, England : 1990)
Author(s)
Lynge E., Ponti A., James T., Májek O., von Euler-Chelpin M., Anttila A., Fitzpatrick P., Frigerio A., Kawai M., Scharpantgen A., Broeders M., Hofvind S., Vidal C., Ederra M., Salas D., Bulliard J.L., Tomatis M., Kerlikowske K., Taplin S.
Working group(s)
ICSN DCIS Working group
ISSN
1879-0852 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0959-8049
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
50
Number
1
Pages
185-192
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is concern about detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in screening mammography. DCIS accounts for a substantial proportion of screen-detected lesions but its effect on breast cancer mortality is debated. The International Cancer Screening Network conducted a comparative analysis to determine variation in DCIS detection.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected during 2004-2008 on number of screening examinations, detected breast cancers, DCIS cases and Globocan 2008 breast cancer incidence rates derived from national or regional cancer registers. We calculated screen-detection rates for breast cancers and DCIS.
RESULTS: Data were obtained from 15 screening settings in 12 countries; 7,176,050 screening examinations; 29,605 breast cancers and 5324 DCIS cases. The ratio between highest and lowest breast cancer incidence was 2.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76-3.00); 2.97 (95% CI 2.51-3.51) for detection of breast cancer; and 3.49 (95% CI 2.70-4.51) for detection of DCIS.
CONCLUSIONS: Considerable international variation was found in DCIS detection. This variation could not be fully explained by variation in incidence nor in breast cancer detection rates. It suggests the potential for wide discrepancies in management of DCIS resulting in overtreatment of indolent DCIS or undertreatment of potentially curable disease. Comprehensive cancer registration is needed to monitor DCIS detection. Efforts to understand discrepancies and standardise management may improve care.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
07/02/2014 19:22
Last modification date
20/08/2019 13:41
Usage data