Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography : a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.

Détails

Ressource 1Télécharger: BIB_130CBE0227E3.P001.pdf (1006.05 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: de l'auteur⸱e
ID Serval
serval:BIB_130CBE0227E3
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography : a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.
Périodique
European Journal of Cancer (oxford, England : 1990)
Auteur⸱e⸱s
Lynge E., Ponti A., James T., Májek O., von Euler-Chelpin M., Anttila A., Fitzpatrick P., Frigerio A., Kawai M., Scharpantgen A., Broeders M., Hofvind S., Vidal C., Ederra M., Salas D., Bulliard J.L., Tomatis M., Kerlikowske K., Taplin S.
Collaborateur⸱rice⸱s
ICSN DCIS Working group
ISSN
1879-0852 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0959-8049
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
50
Numéro
1
Pages
185-192
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Résumé
BACKGROUND: There is concern about detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in screening mammography. DCIS accounts for a substantial proportion of screen-detected lesions but its effect on breast cancer mortality is debated. The International Cancer Screening Network conducted a comparative analysis to determine variation in DCIS detection.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected during 2004-2008 on number of screening examinations, detected breast cancers, DCIS cases and Globocan 2008 breast cancer incidence rates derived from national or regional cancer registers. We calculated screen-detection rates for breast cancers and DCIS.
RESULTS: Data were obtained from 15 screening settings in 12 countries; 7,176,050 screening examinations; 29,605 breast cancers and 5324 DCIS cases. The ratio between highest and lowest breast cancer incidence was 2.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.76-3.00); 2.97 (95% CI 2.51-3.51) for detection of breast cancer; and 3.49 (95% CI 2.70-4.51) for detection of DCIS.
CONCLUSIONS: Considerable international variation was found in DCIS detection. This variation could not be fully explained by variation in incidence nor in breast cancer detection rates. It suggests the potential for wide discrepancies in management of DCIS resulting in overtreatment of indolent DCIS or undertreatment of potentially curable disease. Comprehensive cancer registration is needed to monitor DCIS detection. Efforts to understand discrepancies and standardise management may improve care.
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Création de la notice
07/02/2014 19:22
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 13:41
Données d'usage