The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_1177729713DD
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.
Journal
International orthopaedics
Author(s)
Meriem S., Antoniadis A., Palazzuolo M., Wegrzyn J.
ISSN
1432-5195 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0341-2695
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
48
Number
3
Pages
719-727
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Revision of failed large head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure particularly to reconstruct acetabular bone defect due to osteolysis and to achieve hip stability due to soft tissue damages, both potentially caused by adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of dual mobility cup (DMC) constructs in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings with a special attention to the occurrence of dislocation or re-revision.
Between 2015 and 2019, 57 patients (64 THAs, 41 men, mean age = 65 ± 10 years) underwent revision for MoM THA with the use of DMC were prospectively included in our total joint registry. Mean time to revision was 11 ± 2.5 years. The causes for revision were adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) in 49 THAs (76%), painful hip with elevated blood cobalt-chromium ions in seven (11%), and acetabular aseptic loosening in eight (13%). The revision was complete in 22 THAs (34%) and acetabular only in 42 (66%). Clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and re-revisions were evaluated at most recent follow-up.
At mean follow-up of six ± 1.5 years, the pre- to postoperative Harris Hip Score improved from 74 ± 19 to 92 ± 4 (p = 0.004). Complications occurred in 11 cases (17%): five dislocations (8%), three periprosthetic infections (5%), two aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (3%), and two periprosthetic fractures (3%). Re-revision was required in six cases (9%).
The use of DMC is a reliable option to prevent instability and ensure a stable acetabular reconstruction in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings. However, dislocation after revision remains a concern, particularly in cases of severe soft tissue damage related to ARMD.
Keywords
Male, Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods, Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects, Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Metals/adverse effects, Reoperation/methods, Joint Dislocations/etiology, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD), Dual mobility cup (DMC), Total hip arthroplasty (THA)
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Funding(s)
University of Lausanne
Create date
08/11/2023 18:35
Last modification date
12/03/2024 8:07
Usage data