The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.
Détails
Télécharger: 37907694_BIB_1177729713DD.pdf (848.98 [Ko])
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
Etat: Public
Version: Final published version
Licence: CC BY 4.0
ID Serval
serval:BIB_1177729713DD
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Titre
The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings.
Périodique
International orthopaedics
ISSN
1432-5195 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0341-2695
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
03/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
48
Numéro
3
Pages
719-727
Langue
anglais
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Résumé
Revision of failed large head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure particularly to reconstruct acetabular bone defect due to osteolysis and to achieve hip stability due to soft tissue damages, both potentially caused by adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of dual mobility cup (DMC) constructs in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings with a special attention to the occurrence of dislocation or re-revision.
Between 2015 and 2019, 57 patients (64 THAs, 41 men, mean age = 65 ± 10 years) underwent revision for MoM THA with the use of DMC were prospectively included in our total joint registry. Mean time to revision was 11 ± 2.5 years. The causes for revision were adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) in 49 THAs (76%), painful hip with elevated blood cobalt-chromium ions in seven (11%), and acetabular aseptic loosening in eight (13%). The revision was complete in 22 THAs (34%) and acetabular only in 42 (66%). Clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and re-revisions were evaluated at most recent follow-up.
At mean follow-up of six ± 1.5 years, the pre- to postoperative Harris Hip Score improved from 74 ± 19 to 92 ± 4 (p = 0.004). Complications occurred in 11 cases (17%): five dislocations (8%), three periprosthetic infections (5%), two aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (3%), and two periprosthetic fractures (3%). Re-revision was required in six cases (9%).
The use of DMC is a reliable option to prevent instability and ensure a stable acetabular reconstruction in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings. However, dislocation after revision remains a concern, particularly in cases of severe soft tissue damage related to ARMD.
Between 2015 and 2019, 57 patients (64 THAs, 41 men, mean age = 65 ± 10 years) underwent revision for MoM THA with the use of DMC were prospectively included in our total joint registry. Mean time to revision was 11 ± 2.5 years. The causes for revision were adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) in 49 THAs (76%), painful hip with elevated blood cobalt-chromium ions in seven (11%), and acetabular aseptic loosening in eight (13%). The revision was complete in 22 THAs (34%) and acetabular only in 42 (66%). Clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and re-revisions were evaluated at most recent follow-up.
At mean follow-up of six ± 1.5 years, the pre- to postoperative Harris Hip Score improved from 74 ± 19 to 92 ± 4 (p = 0.004). Complications occurred in 11 cases (17%): five dislocations (8%), three periprosthetic infections (5%), two aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (3%), and two periprosthetic fractures (3%). Re-revision was required in six cases (9%).
The use of DMC is a reliable option to prevent instability and ensure a stable acetabular reconstruction in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings. However, dislocation after revision remains a concern, particularly in cases of severe soft tissue damage related to ARMD.
Mots-clé
Male, Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods, Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects, Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Metals/adverse effects, Reoperation/methods, Joint Dislocations/etiology, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD), Dual mobility cup (DMC), Total hip arthroplasty (THA)
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Oui
Financement(s)
Université de Lausanne
Création de la notice
08/11/2023 17:35
Dernière modification de la notice
08/08/2024 6:30