Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning.

Details

Ressource 1Download: Zeverino-2023.pdf (305.91 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_03629A515559
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated left breast simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy treatment planning.
Journal
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
Author(s)
Zeverino M., Piccolo C., Wuethrich D., Jeanneret-Sozzi W., Marguet M., Bourhis J., Bochud F., Moeckli R.
ISSN
2405-6316 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2405-6316
Publication state
Published
Issued date
10/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
28
Pages
100492
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Automation in radiotherapy treatment planning aims to improve both the quality and the efficiency of the process. The aim of this study was to report on a clinical implementation of a Deep Learning (DL) auto-planning model for left-sided breast cancer.
The DL model was developed for left-sided breast simultaneous integrated boost treatments under deep-inspiration breath-hold. Eighty manual dose distributions were revised and used for training. Ten patients were used for model validation. The model was then used to design 17 clinical auto-plans. Manual and auto-plans were scored on a list of clinical goals for both targets and organs-at-risk (OARs). For validation, predicted and mimicked dose (PD and MD, respectively) percent error (PE) was calculated with respect to manual dose. Clinical and validation cohorts were compared in terms of MD only.
Median values of both PD and MD validation plans fulfilled the evaluation criteria. PE was < 1% for targets for both PD and MD. PD was well aligned to manual dose while MD left lung mean dose was significantly less (median:5.1 Gy vs 6.1 Gy). The left-anterior-descending artery maximum dose was found out of requirements (median values:+5.9 Gy and + 2.9 Gy, for PD and MD respectively) in three validation cases, while it was reduced for clinical cases (median:-1.9 Gy). No other clinically significant differences were observed between clinical and validation cohorts.
Small OAR differences observed during the model validation were not found clinically relevant. The clinical implementation outcomes confirmed the robustness of the model.
Keywords
Automation in radiation therapy, Breast cancer, Deep learning, Treatment planning
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
06/10/2023 13:18
Last modification date
22/12/2023 7:51
Usage data