Do all patients with advanced HER2 positive breast cancer need upfront-chemo when receiving trastuzumab? Randomized phase III trial SAKK 22/99.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_FE5A9B2D8723
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Do all patients with advanced HER2 positive breast cancer need upfront-chemo when receiving trastuzumab? Randomized phase III trial SAKK 22/99.
Journal
Annals of oncology
Author(s)
Pagani O., Klingbiel D., Ruhstaller T., Nolè F., Eppenberger S., Oehlschlegel C., Bernhard J., Brauchli P., Hess D., Mamot C., Munzone E., Pestalozzi B., Rabaglio M., Aebi S., Ribi K., Rochlitz C., Rothgiesser K., Thürlimann B., von Moos R., Zaman K., Goldhirsch A.
Working group(s)
Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)
ISSN
1569-8041 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0923-7534
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/02/2017
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
28
Number
2
Pages
305-312
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Clinical Trial, Phase III ; Journal Article ; Multicenter Study ; Randomized Controlled Trial
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy is standard treatment in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Trastuzumab alone followed by addition of chemotherapy at disease progression versus upfront combination therapy has not been elucidated.
One-hundred seventy-five patients with measurable/evaluable HER2+ advanced disease without previous HER2-directed therapy were randomized to trastuzumab alone followed, at disease progression, by the combination with chemotherapy (Arm A) or upfront trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (Arm B). Chemotherapy could be stopped after ≥6 cycles in responding patients, trastuzumab was continued until progression. The primary endpoint of this superiority trial was time to progression (TTP) on combined trastuzumab-chemotherapy (Combination-TTP) in both arms. Secondary endpoints included response rate, TTP, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity.
Combination-TTP was longer than expected in both arms, 12.2 months in Arm A and 10.3 months in Arm B and not significantly different (hazard ratio [HR] 0.7; 95% CI 0.5-1.1; P =0.1). Overall survival was also not significantly different (HR 0.9; 95% CI 0.6-1.5; P = 0.55). In Arm A, the median TTP before introduction of chemotherapy was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.3-5.4), yet at 2 years 6% of patients were still on trastuzumab alone. Patients without visceral disease had a Combination-TTP of 21.8 months in arm A, compared with 10.1 months in arm B (unplanned analysis HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.2, P = 0.03). Patients with visceral disease showed no difference. Toxicity was chemotherapy-related.
The outcome of patients receiving sequential trastuzumab-chemotherapy or upfront combination was similar. We failed to demonstrate superiority of the sequential approach. These results nevertheless suggest chemotherapy and its toxicity can be deferred, especially in patients with indolent, non-visceral disease. Despite a larger non-inferiority confirmatory study would be needed, these findings represent an additional proof of concept that de-escalation strategies can be discussed in individual patients.

Keywords
Adult, Aged, Anthracyclines/administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism, Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy, Bone Neoplasms/mortality, Bone Neoplasms/secondary, Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy, Breast Neoplasms/mortality, Breast Neoplasms/pathology, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Middle Aged, Proportional Hazards Models, Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism, Trastuzumab/administration & dosage, Treatment Outcome, HER2+, advanced breast cancer, breast cancer, chemotherapy, combination therapy, sequential therapy, trastuzumab
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
29/12/2016 9:41
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:28
Usage data