Reporting guidelines for surgical technique could be improved: a scoping review and a call for action.

Details

Ressource 1Download: 1-s2.0-S0895435622002980-main.pdf (546.96 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: Final published version
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Serval ID
serval:BIB_FE00DC3AE953
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Publication sub-type
Review (review): journal as complete as possible of one specific subject, written based on exhaustive analyses from published work.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Reporting guidelines for surgical technique could be improved: a scoping review and a call for action.
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Author(s)
Shi Q., Ma Y., Zhang X., Jiao P., Zhang K., Barchi L.C., Bedetti B., Wu J., Wei B., Ng CSH, Toker A., Shen J., Fruscio R., Gilbert S., Petersen R.H., Hochwald S., Štupnik T., Elkhayat H., Scarci M., Levi Sandri G.B., Abu Akar F., Waseda R., Sihoe ADL, Fiorelli A., Gonzalez M., Davoli F., Li G.S., Tang X., Qiu B., Wang S.D., Chen Y., Gao S.
ISSN
1878-5921 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0895-4356
Publication state
Published
Issued date
03/2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
155
Pages
1-12
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
To identify reporting guidelines related to surgical technique and propose recommendations for areas that require improvement.
A protocol-guided scoping review was conducted. A literature search of MEDLINE, the EQUATOR Network Library, Google Scholar, and Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations was conducted to identify surgical technique reporting guidelines published up to December 31, 2021.
We finally included 55 surgical technique reporting guidelines, vascular surgery (n = 18, 32.7%) was the most common among the clinical specialties covered. The included guidelines generally showed a low degree of international and multidisciplinary cooperation. Few guidelines provided a detailed development process (n = 14, 25.5%), conducted a systematic literature review (n = 13, 23.6%), used the Delphi method (n = 4, 7.3%), or described post-publication strategy (n = 6, 10.9%). The vast majority guidelines focused on the reporting of intraoperative period (n = 50, 90.9%). However, of the guidelines requiring detailed descriptions of surgical technique methodology (n = 43, 78.2%), most failed to provide guidance on what constitutes an adequate description.
Our study demonstrates significant deficiencies in the development methodology and practicality of reporting guidelines for surgical technique. A standardized reporting guideline that is developed rigorously and focuses on details of surgical technique may serve as a necessary impetus for change.
Keywords
Surgery, methodology, reporting guideline, scoping review, surgical technique, quality control
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
03/01/2023 16:07
Last modification date
16/11/2023 8:24
Usage data