Vitamin and mineral supplements: Are they associated with fatigue?
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_F6F2D92EB0CE
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Vitamin and mineral supplements: Are they associated with fatigue?
Journal
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
ISSN
2405-4577 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
2405-4577
Publication state
Published
Issued date
12/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
64
Pages
527-533
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Vitamin/mineral supplements (VMS) and vitamin/mineral and/or dietary supplements (VMDS) are commonly consumed, based on the belief of their invigorating properties. Still, the association of VMS/VMDS with fatigue in the general population remains sparse and conclusions are mixed. This study aimed to understand the association between VMS/VMDS and fatigue.
Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).
Overall, 2084 (50.8 % female, 61.7 ± 9.8 years) and 1728 (51.0 % female, 64.1 ± 9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean ± sem 3.04 ± 0.13 vs. 2.82 ± 0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p = 0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17 ± 0.22 vs. 5.72 ± 0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p = 0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83 ± 0.19 vs. 2.84 ± 0.03, p = 0.952) and CFS (5.38 ± 0.33 vs. 5.61 ± 0.06, p = 0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03 ± 0.06 vs. 2.76 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) and CFS (6.19 ± 0.11 vs. 5.58 ± 0.06, p < 0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93 ± 0.07 vs. 2.81 ± 0.04, p = 0.161) and CFS (5.78 ± 0.12 vs. 5.54 ± 0.07, p = 0.088).
In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.
Two cross-sectional studies (2014-2017 and 2018-2021) conducted on a population-based cohort. Participants were divided into VMS/VMDS users and non-users. Fatigue levels were assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 14-item version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS).
Overall, 2084 (50.8 % female, 61.7 ± 9.8 years) and 1728 (51.0 % female, 64.1 ± 9.3 years) were included in the first and second surveys, respectively. In the first survey, after multivariable analysis, no association was found between VMS use and FSS: adjusted mean ± sem 3.04 ± 0.13 vs. 2.82 ± 0.03 for users and non-users, respectively, p = 0.083, while users scored higher in the CFS: 6.17 ± 0.22 vs. 5.72 ± 0.06 for users and non-users, respectively, p = 0.048. In the second survey, no association was found between VMS use and FSS (2.83 ± 0.19 vs. 2.84 ± 0.03, p = 0.952) and CFS (5.38 ± 0.33 vs. 5.61 ± 0.06, p = 0.504). In the first survey, VMDS users scored higher in both FSS (3.03 ± 0.06 vs. 2.76 ± 0.04, p < 0.001) and CFS (6.19 ± 0.11 vs. 5.58 ± 0.06, p < 0.001) while no differences were found in the second survey in both FSS (2.93 ± 0.07 vs. 2.81 ± 0.04, p = 0.161) and CFS (5.78 ± 0.12 vs. 5.54 ± 0.07, p = 0.088).
In this population-based cross-sectional study, the authors found no consistent association between VMS consumption and fatigue. Participants taking VMDS tended to present with higher fatigue scores.
Keywords
Humans, Female, Dietary Supplements, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fatigue, Male, Vitamins/administration & dosage, Minerals/administration & dosage, Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dietary supplements, Epidemiology, Minerals, Vitamins
Pubmed
Open Access
Yes
Create date
18/11/2024 10:45
Last modification date
03/12/2024 7:22