How to address patients' defences: a pilot study of the accuracy of defence interpretations and alliance

Détails

ID Serval
serval:BIB_F0217902BEB7
Type
Article: article d'un périodique ou d'un magazine.
Collection
Publications
Titre
How to address patients' defences: a pilot study of the accuracy of defence interpretations and alliance
Périodique
Psychology and Psychotherapy
Auteur(s)
Junod Olivier, Roten Yves de, Martinez Elena, Drapeau Martin, Despland Jean-Nicolas
ISSN
1476-0835
Statut éditorial
Publié
Date de publication
2005
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
78
Numéro
4
Pages
419-430
Langue
anglais
Notes
SAPHIRID:61528
Résumé
This pilot study examined the accuracy of therapist defence interpretations (TAD) in high-alliance patients (N = 7) and low-alliance patients (N = 8). TAD accuracy was assessed in the two subgroups by comparing for each case the patient's most frequent defensive level with the most frequent defensive level addressed by the therapist when making defence interpretations. Results show that in high-alliance patient-therapist dyads, the therapists tend to address accurate or higher (more mature) defensive level than patients most frequent level. On the other hand, the therapists address lower (more immature) defensive level in low-alliance dyads. These results are discussed along with possible ways to better assess TAD accuracy
Pubmed
Web of science
Création de la notice
10/03/2008 10:03
Dernière modification de la notice
20/08/2019 16:17
Données d'usage