Is it possible to perfectly simulate a signature, in the particular and challenging case where the signature is simple? A set of signatures of six writers, considered to be simple on the basis of highlighted criteria, was sampled. These signatures were transferred to forgers requested to produce freehand simulations. Among these simulations, those capable of reproducing the features of the reference signatures were submitted for evaluation to forensic document experts through proficiency testing. The results suggest that there is no perfect simulation.
With the supplementary aim of assessing the influence of forger's skills on the results, forgers were selected from three distinct populations, which differ according to professional criteria. The results indicate some differences in graphical capabilities between individuals. However, no trend could be established regarding age, degrees, years of practice and time dedicated to the exercise. The findings show that simulation is made easier if a graphical compatibility exists between the forger's own writing and the signature to be reproduced. Moreover, a global difficulty to preserve proportions and slant as well as the shape of capital letters and initials has been noticed.