Validation of the aphasic depression rating scale.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_E1B1F7A61B47
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
Validation of the aphasic depression rating scale.
Journal
Stroke
Author(s)
Benaim C., Cailly B., Perennou D., Pelissier J.
ISSN
1524-4628 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0039-2499
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2004
Volume
35
Number
7
Pages
1692-1696
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Validation Studies Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Aphasic Depression Rating Scale (ADRS) was developed to detect and measure depression in aphasic patients during the subacute stage of stroke.
METHODS: Six experts selected an initial sampling of behavioral items from existing depression rating scales. Stroke patients (aphasic and nonaphasic) were assessed with these items by the rehabilitation staff, with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) for nonaphasic patients only, by a psychiatrist, and by the rehabilitation staff with Visual Analog Scales (VAS). A second item selection was conducted after a regression algorithm was run including VAS as independent variables (criterion validity) and after their factorial structure was analyzed with a principal component analysis (factorial validity). The construct validity was evaluated with respect to the other depression assessments. A threshold for the diagnosis of depression was computed with respect to the psychiatrist's diagnosis. Interrater and test-retest reliability were assessed in 2 additional groups of aphasic patients.
RESULTS: Eighty patients participated in the study (59 aphasic). Fifteen behavioral items from existing depression rating scales were selected, and 9 were retained after the validation process. ADRS correlated highly with VAS and HDRS (r=0.60 to 0.78, P=10(-4) to 10(-6)). With respect to the psychiatrist's diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of ADRS were 0.83 and 0.71, respectively, when the threshold was set at 9/32. Its factorial structure was comparable to HDRS structure. Interrater and test-retest reliability were high (average kappa coefficient of the 9 items=0.69).
CONCLUSIONS: ADRS is a valid, reliable, sensitive, and specific tool for the evaluation of depression in aphasic patients during the stroke subacute phase.
Keywords
Adult, Aged, Aphasia/complications, Depression/diagnosis, Depression/etiology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stroke/complications
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
19/01/2016 14:30
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:05
Usage data