Grading system for assessing the confidence in the epileptogenic zone reported in published studies: A Delphi consensus study.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_DFBD53946EC9
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Grading system for assessing the confidence in the epileptogenic zone reported in published studies: A Delphi consensus study.
Journal
Epilepsia
Author(s)
Ryvlin P., Barba C., Bartolomei F., Baumgartner C., Brazdil M., Fabo D., Fahoum F., Frauscher B., Ikeda A., Lhatoo S., Mani J., McGonigal A., Metsahonkala E.L., Mindruta I., Nguyen D.K., Rheims S., Rocamora R., Rydenhag B., Schuele S., Schulze-Bonhage A., Surges R., Vulliemoz S., Beniczky S.
ISSN
1528-1167 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0013-9580
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2024
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
65
Number
5
Pages
1346-1359
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
This study was undertaken to develop a standardized grading system based on expert consensus for evaluating the level of confidence in the localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) as reported in published studies, to harmonize and facilitate systematic reviews in the field of epilepsy surgery.
We conducted a Delphi study involving 22 experts from 18 countries, who were asked to rate their level of confidence in the localization of the EZ for various theoretical clinical scenarios, using different scales. Information provided in these scenarios included one or several of the following data: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, invasive electroencephalography summary, and postoperative seizure outcome.
The first explorative phase showed an overall interrater agreement of .347, pointing to large heterogeneity among experts' assessments, with only 17% of the 42 proposed scenarios associated with a substantial level of agreement. A majority showed preferences for the simpler scale and single-item scenarios. The successive Delphi voting phases resulted in a majority consensus across experts, with more than two thirds of respondents agreeing on the rating of each of the tested single-item scenarios. High or very high levels of confidence were ascribed to patients with either an Engel class I or class IA postoperative seizure outcome, a well-delineated EZ according to all available invasive EEG (iEEG) data, or a well-delineated focal epileptogenic lesion on MRI. MRI signs of hippocampal sclerosis or atrophy were associated with a moderate level of confidence, whereas a low level was ascribed to other MRI findings, a poorly delineated EZ according to iEEG data, or an Engel class II-IV postoperative seizure outcome.
The proposed grading system, based on an expert consensus, provides a simple framework to rate the level of confidence in the EZ reported in published studies in a structured and harmonized way, offering an opportunity to facilitate and increase the quality of systematic reviews and guidelines in the field of epilepsy surgery.
Keywords
Humans, Delphi Technique, Consensus, Electroencephalography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards, Epilepsy/surgery, Epilepsy/diagnostic imaging, Epilepsy/diagnosis, Delphi, confidence, epilepsy surgery, epileptogenic zone, grading system
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
04/03/2024 16:40
Last modification date
14/05/2024 6:54
Usage data