Labyrinthine fenestration for stapes fixation in chronic ear disease others than otosclerosis.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_DF3266E1FA8F
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Labyrinthine fenestration for stapes fixation in chronic ear disease others than otosclerosis.
Journal
European Archives of Oto-rhino-laryngology
Author(s)
Zaugg Y., Linder T.
ISSN
1434-4726 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0937-4477
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
272
Number
9
Pages
2161-2166
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish
Abstract
The objective of this study is to assess the results of labyrinthine fenestration for fixed stapes in chronic ear disease. Using a prospective database, pre- and postoperative audiometric data from patients undergoing labyrinthine fenestration for fixation of the stapes in chronic ear disease others than otosclerosis between 2002 and 2012 were evaluated. Twenty-three labyrinthine fenestrations in chronic ear disease were performed (17 malleo-stapedotomies, 4 incus-stapedotomies, 1 neo-malleus-stapedotomy, 1 TORP-stapedotomy). Overall, the mean short-term (2 months) and long-term (42 months) postoperative air-bone gap (0.5-3 kHz) were 17.5 and 16.5 dB, respectively; long-term air-bone gap of <20 dB was obtained in 73 % of patients. There was no significant difference in air-bone gap closure between tympanosclerotic and post inflammatory osteogenic fixation of the stapes (p = 0.267). Hearing benefit success using the 'Belfast rule of the thumb' was achieved in 48 %. Normal bilateral hearing was achieved in 17 % and bilateral symmetric hearing impairment in 26 %. Only in 4 %, bone conduction worsened by more than 5 dB. Labyrinthine fenestration is an option in selected cases of stapes fixation in chronic ear disease and provides hearing gain without significant risk for sensorineural hearing loss. In those already selected cases, hearing benefit success 'Belfast rule of the thumb' is achieved only in half of the cases. This and the possible alternatives, should therefore be discussed preoperatively.
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
28/08/2015 18:24
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:03
Usage data