Cost evaluation and comparison of three decision strategies to revascularize : results of the suspected CAD protocol of the european CMR registry
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_DED0B56828F5
Type
Inproceedings: an article in a conference proceedings.
Publication sub-type
Abstract (Abstract): shot summary in a article that contain essentials elements presented during a scientific conference, lecture or from a poster.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Cost evaluation and comparison of three decision strategies to revascularize : results of the suspected CAD protocol of the european CMR registry
Title of the conference
Barcelona : Congress of the European-Society-of-Cardiology (ESC), 30 August-03 September, 2014
ISBN
0195-668X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2014
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
35
Pages
552-553
Language
english
Abstract
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is accepted as a method to assess suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Nonetheless, invasive coronary angiography (CXA) combined or not with fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the main diagnostic test to evaluate CAD. Little data exist on the economic impact of the use of these procedures in a population with a low to intermediate pre-test probability.
Objective: To compare the costs of 3 decision strategies to revascularize a patient with suspected CAD: 1) strategy guided by CMR 2) hypothetical strategy guided by CXA-FFR, 3) hypothetical strategy guided by CXA alone.
Objective: To compare the costs of 3 decision strategies to revascularize a patient with suspected CAD: 1) strategy guided by CMR 2) hypothetical strategy guided by CXA-FFR, 3) hypothetical strategy guided by CXA alone.
Keywords
Cardiovascular System, Cardiology
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
24/02/2015 12:46
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:03
Usage data
