Target Product Profile for a Diagnostic Assay to Differentiate between Bacterial and Non-Bacterial Infections and Reduce Antimicrobial Overuse in Resource-Limited Settings: An Expert Consensus.

Details

Ressource 1Download: BIB_DD9368217D77.P001.pdf (239.75 [Ko])
State: Public
Version: author
Serval ID
serval:BIB_DD9368217D77
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Target Product Profile for a Diagnostic Assay to Differentiate between Bacterial and Non-Bacterial Infections and Reduce Antimicrobial Overuse in Resource-Limited Settings: An Expert Consensus.
Journal
PloS one
Author(s)
Dittrich S., Tadesse B.T., Moussy F., Chua A., Zorzet A., Tängdén T., Dolinger D.L., Page A.L., Crump J.A., D'Acremont V., Bassat Q., Lubell Y., Newton P.N., Heinrich N., Rodwell T.J., González I.J.
ISSN
1932-6203 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1932-6203
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2016
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
11
Number
8
Pages
e0161721
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
Acute fever is one of the most common presenting symptoms globally. In order to reduce the empiric use of antimicrobial drugs and improve outcomes, it is essential to improve diagnostic capabilities. In the absence of microbiology facilities in low-income settings, an assay to distinguish bacterial from non-bacterial causes would be a critical first step. To ensure that patient and market needs are met, the requirements of such a test should be specified in a target product profile (TPP). To identify minimal/optimal characteristics for a bacterial vs. non-bacterial fever test, experts from academia and international organizations with expertise in infectious diseases, diagnostic test development, laboratory medicine, global health, and health economics were convened. Proposed TPPs were reviewed by this working group, and consensus characteristics were defined. The working group defined non-severely ill, non-malaria infected children as the target population for the desired assay. To provide access to the most patients, the test should be deployable to community health centers and informal health settings, and staff should require <2 days of training to perform the assay. Further, given that the aim is to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use as well as to deliver appropriate treatment for patients with bacterial infections, the group agreed on minimal diagnostic performance requirements of >90% and >80% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Other key characteristics, to account for the challenging environment at which the test is targeted, included: i) time-to-result <10 min (but maximally <2 hrs); ii) storage conditions at 0-40°C, ≤90% non-condensing humidity with a minimal shelf life of 12 months; iii) operational conditions of 5-40°C, ≤90% non-condensing humidity; and iv) minimal sample collection needs (50-100μL, capillary blood). This expert approach to define assay requirements for a bacterial vs. non-bacterial assay should guide product development, and enable targeted and timely efforts by industry partners and academic institutions.

Keywords
Bacterial Infections/diagnosis, Consensus, Developing Countries, Diagnosis, Differential, Fever/diagnosis, Humans, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/economics, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/economics, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards, Sensitivity and Specificity
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
16/09/2016 20:32
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:02
Usage data