Wound-healing gene family expression differences between fetal and foreskin cells used for bioengineered skin substitutes.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_DC42C6BFDF44
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Wound-healing gene family expression differences between fetal and foreskin cells used for bioengineered skin substitutes.
Journal
Artificial Organs
Author(s)
Hirt-Burri N., Scaletta C., Gerber S., Pioletti D.P., Applegate L.A.
ISSN
1525-1594 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0160-564X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2008
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
32
Number
7
Pages
509-518
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Comparative Study ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
For tissue engineering, several cell types and tissues have been proposed as starting material. Allogenic skin products available for therapeutic usage are mostly developed with cell culture and with foreskin tissue of young individuals. Fetal skin cells offer a valuable solution for effective and safe tissue engineering for wounds due to their rapid growth and simple cell culture. By selecting families of genes that have been reported to be implicated in wound repair and particularly for scarless fetal wound healing including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily, extracellular matrix, and nerve/angiogenesis growth factors, we have analyzed differences in their expression between fetal skin and foreskin cells, and the same passages. Of the five TGF-beta superfamily genes analyzed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, three were found to be significantly different with sixfold up-regulated for TGF-beta2, and 3.8-fold for BMP-6 in fetal cells, whereas GDF-10 was 11.8-fold down-regulated. For nerve growth factors, midkine was 36-fold down-regulated in fetal cells, and pleiotrophin was 4.76-fold up-regulated. We propose that fetal cells present technical and therapeutic advantages compared to foreskin cells for effective cell-based therapy for wound management, and overall differences in gene expression could contribute to the degree of efficiency seen in clinical use with these cells.
Keywords
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 3, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6, Bone Morphogenetic Proteins/genetics, Carrier Proteins/genetics, Cell Line, Cell Transplantation, Cytokines/genetics, Fibroblasts/cytology, Fibroblasts/metabolism, Foreskin/cytology, Foreskin/metabolism, Gene Expression Regulation, Growth Differentiation Factor 10, Humans, Male, Multigene Family, Nerve Growth Factors/genetics, RNA/genetics, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Skin/cytology, Skin/embryology, Skin Transplantation, Skin, Artificial, Tissue Culture Techniques, Tissue Engineering, Transforming Growth Factor beta2/genetics, Wound Healing/genetics
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
22/01/2009 14:28
Last modification date
20/08/2019 17:01
Usage data