An international consensus approach to the management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_DC2F8EFC4257
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
An international consensus approach to the management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children
Journal
Pediatr Nephrol
Author(s)
Loirat C., Fakhouri F., Ariceta G., Besbas N., Bitzan M., Bjerre A., Coppo R., Emma F., Johnson S., Karpman D., Landau D., Langman C. B., Lapeyraque A. L., Licht C., Nester C., Pecoraro C., Riedl M., van de Kar N. C., Van de Walle J., Vivarelli M., Fremeaux-Bacchi V., H. U. S. International HUS
ISSN
1432-198X (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0931-041X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
01/2016
Volume
31
Number
1
Pages
15-39
Language
english
Notes
Loirat, Chantal
Fakhouri, Fadi
Ariceta, Gema
Besbas, Nesrin
Bitzan, Martin
Bjerre, Anna
Coppo, Rosanna
Emma, Francesco
Johnson, Sally
Karpman, Diana
Landau, Daniel
Langman, Craig B
Lapeyraque, Anne-Laure
Licht, Christoph
Nester, Carla
Pecoraro, Carmine
Riedl, Magdalena
van de Kar, Nicole C A J
Van de Walle, Johan
Vivarelli, Marina
Fremeaux-Bacchi, Veronique
eng
Practice Guideline
Review
Germany
Pediatr Nephrol. 2016 Jan;31(1):15-39. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3076-8. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
Abstract
Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) emerged during the last decade as a disease largely of complement dysregulation. This advance facilitated the development of novel, rational treatment options targeting terminal complement activation, e.g., using an anti-C5 antibody (eculizumab). We review treatment and patient management issues related to this therapeutic approach. We present consensus clinical practice recommendations generated by HUS International, an international expert group of clinicians and basic scientists with a focused interest in HUS. We aim to address the following questions of high relevance to daily clinical practice: Which complement investigations should be done and when? What is the importance of anti-factor H antibody detection? Who should be treated with eculizumab? Is plasma exchange therapy still needed? When should eculizumab therapy be initiated? How and when should complement blockade be monitored? Can the approved treatment schedule be modified? What approach should be taken to kidney and/or combined liver-kidney transplantation? How should we limit the risk of meningococcal infection under complement blockade therapy? A pressing question today regards the treatment duration. We discuss the need for prospective studies to establish evidence-based criteria for the continuation or cessation of anticomplement therapy in patients with and without identified complement mutations.
Keywords
Adolescent, Age Factors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use, Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome/diagnosis/epidemiology/immunology/*therapy, Child, Child, Preschool, Combined Modality Therapy, Complement Activation/drug effects, Consensus, Cooperative Behavior, Drug Monitoring, Humans, Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use, Infant, Infant, Newborn, International Cooperation, Kidney Transplantation, Liver Transplantation, Monitoring, Immunologic, Nephrology/*standards, Patient Selection, Plasma Exchange, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Anti-factor H antibody, Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, Children, Combined liver-kidney transplantation, Complement, Eculizumab, Hemolytic uremic syndrome, Plasma infusion, Thrombotic microangiopathy
Pubmed
Create date
01/03/2022 11:18
Last modification date
02/03/2022 7:36
Usage data