Effectiveness of a real-life program (DIAfit) to promote physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_DB34AEF140E7
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Effectiveness of a real-life program (DIAfit) to promote physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial.
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN
1664-2392 (Print)
ISSN-L
1664-2392
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2023
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
14
Pages
1155217
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Randomized Controlled Trial ; Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Publication Status: epublish
Publication Status: epublish
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a real-life clinical physical activity program (DIAfit) on improving physical fitness, body composition, and cardiometabolic health in an unselected population with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to compare the effects of two variants a different exercise frequencies on the same outcomes.
This was a cluster randomized-controlled assessor-blind trial conducted in 11 clinical centres in Switzerland. All participants in the clinical program with type 2 diabetes were eligible and were randomized to either standard (3 sessions/week for 12 weeks) or alternative (1 session/week for the first four weeks, then 2 sessions/week for the rest of 16 weeks) physical activity program each consisting of 36 sessions of combined aerobic and resistance exercise. Allocation was concealed by a central office unrelated to the study. The primary outcome was aerobic fitness. Secondary outcome measures included: body composition, BMI, HbA <sub>1c</sub> , muscle strength, walking speed, balance, flexibility, blood pressure, lipid profile.
All 185 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59.7 +-10.2 years, 48% women) agreed to participate and were randomized in two groups: a standard group (n=88) and an alternative group (n=97)). There was an 11% increase in aerobic fitness after the program (12.5 Watts; 95% CI 6.76 to 18.25; p<0.001). Significant improvements in physical fitness, body composition, and cardiometabolic parameters were observed at the end of the DIAfit program (improvements between 2-29%) except for lean body mass, triglycerides and cholesterol. No differences were observed between both programs, except for a larger weight reduction of -0.97kg (95% CI -0.04 to -1.91; p=0.04) in the standard program.
Both frequency variants of the nation-wide DIAfit program had beneficial effects on physical fitness, HbA <sub>1c</sub> , body composition, and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes patients and differences were negligible.
clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01289587.
This was a cluster randomized-controlled assessor-blind trial conducted in 11 clinical centres in Switzerland. All participants in the clinical program with type 2 diabetes were eligible and were randomized to either standard (3 sessions/week for 12 weeks) or alternative (1 session/week for the first four weeks, then 2 sessions/week for the rest of 16 weeks) physical activity program each consisting of 36 sessions of combined aerobic and resistance exercise. Allocation was concealed by a central office unrelated to the study. The primary outcome was aerobic fitness. Secondary outcome measures included: body composition, BMI, HbA <sub>1c</sub> , muscle strength, walking speed, balance, flexibility, blood pressure, lipid profile.
All 185 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59.7 +-10.2 years, 48% women) agreed to participate and were randomized in two groups: a standard group (n=88) and an alternative group (n=97)). There was an 11% increase in aerobic fitness after the program (12.5 Watts; 95% CI 6.76 to 18.25; p<0.001). Significant improvements in physical fitness, body composition, and cardiometabolic parameters were observed at the end of the DIAfit program (improvements between 2-29%) except for lean body mass, triglycerides and cholesterol. No differences were observed between both programs, except for a larger weight reduction of -0.97kg (95% CI -0.04 to -1.91; p=0.04) in the standard program.
Both frequency variants of the nation-wide DIAfit program had beneficial effects on physical fitness, HbA <sub>1c</sub> , body composition, and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes patients and differences were negligible.
clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01289587.
Keywords
Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Male, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy, Exercise, Physical Fitness/physiology, Muscle Strength/physiology, Cardiovascular Diseases, aerobic fitness, body composition, physical activity, randomized clinical trial, type 2 diabetes mellitus
Pubmed
Web of science
Open Access
Yes
Create date
31/07/2023 12:01
Last modification date
23/01/2024 7:35