Who Should Be Operated When Presenting with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm? A Monocentric Study in a Tertiary Hospital.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_D96E7AFC7730
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Who Should Be Operated When Presenting with a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm? A Monocentric Study in a Tertiary Hospital.
Journal
Annals of vascular surgery
Author(s)
Holzer T., Deglise S., Ballabeni P., Corpataux J.M., Saucy F.
ISSN
1615-5947 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
0890-5096
Publication state
Published
Issued date
05/2018
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
49
Pages
158-163
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Mortality with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) is 80% overall, 50% when operated, and 100% when not operated. Distinguishing in emergency patients who should be operated versus being offered palliative treatment is difficult. We sought to identify key factors to consider in this decision-making.
Between 2001 and 2014, we selected all consecutive patients with rAAA treated by open or endovascular procedures in a tertiary hospital for inclusion in this retrospective, single-center study. Symptomatic aneurysms and isolated ruptured iliac aneurysms were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were institutionalization rate and long-term mortality. Associations between predictive factors and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using univariate logistic regression. The local ethics committee approved this study.
The mean age (±standard deviation) of the 72 included patients was 73 years (±9.0) and 88% were men. Among the 65 open (90%) and 7 endovascular procedures (10%), overall in-hospital mortality was 21%, 1- and 2-year mortalities were both 26%, and the institutionalization rate was 5%. Mean follow-up was 43 months (Kaplan-Meier estimate). Univariate analysis identified age as associated with a 20% per year increased risk of in-hospital mortality (correlation, P < 0.0001). Female sex was the other main preoperative risk factor correlated with in-hospital mortality (P = 0.006). Significant perioperative risk factors were suprarenal clamping (P = 0.038), amount of fresh frozen plasma transfused (P = 0.018), and number of blood transfusions (P < 0.0001).
The most significant preoperative mortality-related factors were age and female sex. Our study also showed that institutionalization and long-term mortality are not factors to consider in the decision-making process.
Keywords
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery, Aortic Rupture/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Rupture/mortality, Aortic Rupture/surgery, Clinical Decision-Making, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Hospital Mortality, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Patient Selection, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Switzerland, Tertiary Care Centers, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects, Vascular Surgical Procedures/mortality
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
03/03/2018 15:20
Last modification date
20/08/2019 16:58
Usage data