The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Details

Serval ID
serval:BIB_D2D7C16F4808
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Title
The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.
Journal
Current cardiology reports
Author(s)
Ang R., Domenichini G., Finlay M.C., Schilling R.J., Hunter R.J.
ISSN
1534-3170 (Electronic)
ISSN-L
1523-3782
Publication state
Published
Issued date
09/2015
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
17
Number
9
Pages
631
Language
english
Notes
Publication types: Journal Article ; Review
Publication Status: ppublish
Abstract
Catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in maintaining sinus rhythm for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of any AF ablation procedure. Conventionally, this is achieved by performing point by point lesions using radiofrequency (RF) energy. However, this is technically challenging, time consuming and is associated with a number of complications. Long-term durability of PV isolation is also a concern. To address these issues, 'one-shot' energy delivery systems and alternative energy sources have been developed. The cryoballoon system has emerged as the most commonly used alternative to point by point RF technology. In this paper, we compare the technology, biophysics and clinical data of cryoballoon to conventional RF ablation for AF. The safety and efficacy of cryoballoon compared to RF ablation is critically reviewed. We conclude by looking at future applications of this technology.
Keywords
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use, Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology, Atrial Fibrillation/therapy, Catheter Ablation, Cryosurgery, Humans, Pulmonary Veins/innervation, Pulmonary Veins/pathology, Treatment Outcome
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
03/03/2024 15:35
Last modification date
11/03/2024 7:17
Usage data