Combining clinical factors and quantitative ultrasound improves the detection of women both at low and high risk for hip fracture.
Details
Serval ID
serval:BIB_D2B1B43872E4
Type
Article: article from journal or magazin.
Collection
Publications
Institution
Title
Combining clinical factors and quantitative ultrasound improves the detection of women both at low and high risk for hip fracture.
Journal
Osteoporosis International
ISSN
0937-941X
Publication state
Published
Issued date
2007
Peer-reviewed
Oui
Volume
18
Number
12
Pages
1651-1659
Language
english
Abstract
We hypothesized that combining clinical risk factors (CRF) with the heel stiffness index (SI) measured via quantitative ultrasound (QUS) would improve the detection of women both at low and high risk for hip fracture. Categorizing women by risk score improved the specificity of detection to 42.4%, versus 33.8% using CRF alone and 38.4% using the SI alone. This combined CRF-SI score could be used wherever and whenever DXA is not readily accessible. INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Several strategies have been proposed to identify women at high risk for osteoporosis-related fractures; we wanted to investigate whether combining clinical risk factors (CRF) and heel QUS parameters could provide a more accurate tool to identify women at both low and high risk for hip fracture than either CRF or QUS alone. METHODS: We pooled two Caucasian cohorts, EPIDOS and SEMOF, into a large database named "EPISEM", in which 12,064 women, 70 to 100 years old, were analyzed. Amongst all the CRF available in EPISEM, we used only the ones which were statistically significant in a Cox multivariate model. Then, we constructed a risk score, by combining the QUS-derived heel stiffness index (SI) and the following seven CRF: patient age, body mass index (BMI), fracture history, fall history, diabetes history, chair-test results, and past estrogen treatment. RESULTS: Using the composite SI-CRF score, 42% of the women who did not report a hip fracture were found to be at low risk at baseline, and 57% of those who subsequently sustained a fracture were at high risk. Using the SI alone, corresponding percentages were 38% and 52%; using CRF alone, 34% and 53%. The number of subjects in the intermediate group was reduced from 5,400 (including 112 hip fractures) and 5,032 (including 111 hip fractures) to 4,549 (including 100 including fractures) for the CRF and QUS alone versus the combination score. CONCLUSIONS: Combining clinical risk factors to heel bone ultrasound appears to correctly identify more women at low risk for hip fracture than either the stiffness index or the CRF alone; it improves the detection of women both at low and high risk.
Keywords
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Mass Index, Calcaneus, Epidemiologic Methods, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Recurrence
Pubmed
Web of science
Create date
02/03/2009 12:33
Last modification date
20/08/2019 15:52